ADA Systematic Review: Summary of Year 2, Rapid Evidence Review
ADA Systematic Review: Summary of Year 2, Rapid Evidence Review
Research on the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) includes many different issues and impacts diverse groups of people. Because of this broad range of research, policy makers are often unsure about the true impact of the ADA. We are getting close to the 25th anniversary of the ADA, and we still do not know for certain if the law is meeting its original goals. To address this uncertainty, the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) is conducting a five-year review of the ADA as part of the NIDRR-funded National ADA Knowledge Translation Center based at the University of Washington. The project has three steps: a scoping review, a rapid evidence review, and systematic reviews. The research team has recently finished the second year of the project (the rapid evidence review).
Rapid Evidence Review: The purpose of the rapid evidence review is to begin improving our understanding of what findings exists about the impact of the ADA, and to create a process for reviewing research in the future. This second stage responds to findings from the first year of this project (the scoping review) that was completed in 2013. The scoping review involved gathering all of the scientific research on the ADA. We created a summary of which groups of people were studied; what areas were most often studied; how the topics were studied; and what research needed further attention. The area of employment was selected for the rapid evidence review because it is a critical policy priority. It also has the largest amount of research and presents many conflicting arguments that need further answers.
Research Question: Based on ADA stakeholder feedback, the rapid evidence review specifically looked at: What evidence exists that the ADA has influenced knowledge, attitudes and perceptions about the employment of people with disabilities?
What We Did:
- Collected feedback from the ADA Expert Panel and representatives from the ADA National Network to help identify the different topics areas to review, the type of research to include, and common debates about the ADA’s influence.
- Assessed the quality of the employment research using an evaluation guide.
- Compiled ADA employment research evidence in a database and categorized it using a process called thematic coding.
- Analyzed the evidence using an adapted technique called meta-synthesis. This process involves identifying and describing findings and conclusions about the ADA in relation to the research question.
What We Found:
What Is Next: We will begin stage three of the project: full systematic reviews of selected topics identified by the research team with help from the ADA Expert Panel and other key stakeholders. Moving forward, we will continue to share our research findings to increase the use of ADA research to help inform policies and practices that maximize the full inclusion in society for individuals with disabilities.
Contact: Sarah Parker Harris (skparker@uic.edu) and Robert Gould (rgould3@uic.edu)

